Chairman Pai has stated that he will ignore all comments or objections to his proposal to throttle the internet for corporate profit, if those comments appeal to moral principal, patriotism, logic or reason.  The only comments he will give weight to are those involving economic impacts.  So here's a comment that involves economic impact.

Here is an economic impact argument against a pay to play internet:

Small businesses, those employing less than 20 people create the vast majority of new jobs.  Small business, not massive investor owned corporations, are the driving force in our consumer economy.  They are the source of consumer spending.  

Throttling the internet to give large volume players pay to play preference relegates small business to the slow lane, creating a corporate monopoly on the rapid exchange of information.  Throttling the commerce of small business will directly impact both employment and the demand side of the economy, as more people are driven to corporations that source their products overseas, rather than domestically. 

History has demonstrated over and over again that monopolistic practices, though yielding short term gains, inevitably drive the economy into recession as consumers lose buying power and demand collapses.

There!!  Chairman Pai, that's an economic argument for maintaining net neutrality.  Pay attention to it!!