I am sending my personal message in support of net neutrality, which prevents ISP's from blocking, throttling, or altering any content on the internet. They should just deliver it from the source to the recipient, unaltered and unimpeded.

Chairman Ajit Pai is trying to change the rules in favor of the big ISP's, like Verizon, where he came from. This seems to be a conflict of interest; his rule should be thrown out and he should be removed from his position. 

The internet was built by a government project funded by US taxpayers, and opened to the public as an avenue to communicate openly. Why are the needs of a few corporations more important than the needs of the American people? The internet belongs to the public, not to Comcast, Verizon, the FCC, or Mr. Pai. 

The FCC should be working to ensure a fair and open Internet for all by opposing efforts to undermine net neutrality. The FCC should throw out Chairman Ajit Pai’s plan to hand the telecom giants like Comcast, Verizon, and AT&T the legal cover to create Internet fast lanes, stripping Internet users of the necessary access and privacy safeguards we demanded and just recently won. 

The existing Open Internet rules mean that Internet providers can’t block or slow customers’ ability to see certain websites or engage in data discrimination by charging online services and websites money to reach people faster. That’s the best way forward to ensure the Internet remains a level playing field that benefits small businesses and Internet users as well as entrenched Internet companies.

Congress needs to pass a law to protect net neutrality, so that we don't have the overreaching FCC trying to sell us out every few years. Why does the internet even come under the jurisdiction of the FCC? It is more of a utility these days. We don't have water companies charging more for water we cook with than water we shower with. I think it belongs under the FTC, like the phone, electric, and gas companies. Removing the regulation from the internet providers will create monopolies, which are against the Sherman anti-trust act.