By the people, for the people.  Internet freedom is endowed on the people, not corporations.

The FCC’s proposal contravenes Congress's intent — the FCC should tread carefully before interfering with content creation. While some may argue that this distinction should be abandoned because of changes in today’s market, that choice is not the FCC’s to make. The decision remains squarely with those in Congress — and they have repeatedly chosen to leave the law as it is.

The Commission’s proposal performs a historical sleight of hand that impermissibly conflates this fundamental distinction. The FCC proposes to treat network infrastructure as information services because the infrastructure gives access to the services running over their networks. The FCC contends that ISPs are therefore “offering the capability” to use the services that create the content.

However this suggestion obliterates the distinction that Congress set in to law — they meant for the FCC to consider services that carry data separately from those that create data. The FCC’s proposal would therefore read this fundamental choice that was made, out of the law. Under the proposal’s suggestion, no service could be a telecommunications service going forward.