"Restoring Internet Freedom", to whom?

If ISPs are allowed to constrict traffic for some website owners but not others, this reduces freedom of reasonable access to these sites, and thus reduces Internet freedom to the website owners as well as those accessing the sites.  Shouldn't this change be labeled "Greater ISP freedom at the expense of the rest of the Internet"?  This change isn't about freedom at all, but greed for a few.

Note that when reasonable people get back in charge in Washington, and we will, we're reverting the heck out of this change.  We support true Internet freedom, and that is net neutrality.  Net Neutrality forever.

Signed,
Steve Magruder, 7709 Crestline Road, Louisville, Kentucky 40214, steve@metroissues.com