Leave Internet Service providers under Title II as they are. Removing them will only serve to allow these providers to inhibit free growth of new providers of content, and will throttle the neutrality of the net we currently enjoy. The falsehood of the claim that leaving them under Title II restricts investment in infrastructure as patently proven wrong by just how much investment has been made while they've been under Title II, and is frankly, a bullshit attempt to fool the public. The current FCC administration has suggested there was a decline of about 5 percent in capital expenditure by broadband providers after the Order took effect. But other analyses suggest that some of that apparent decline was planned well ahead of time (a carrier winding down a major infrastructure rollout, for instance), and that overall investment is UP! Executives of telecoms are on the record saying that net neutrality and Title II won’t be affecting their investments much if at all. If they were, they probably would have shouted it from the rooftops, since it would be helpful in the fight to change their classification. The current director of the FCC has made the claim that Title II-based rules are unnecessary, because the Internet Service Providers will 'police themselves'...but Internet Service Providers have attempted to throttle traffic by type or by user (Comcast in 2007), have imposed arbitrary and secret caps on data (AT&T 2011-2014), hidden fees that had no justification or documentation (Comcast in 2016), and tried to give technical advantages to their own services over those of competitors (AT&T in 2016). These attempts were only revealed in retrospect once they were discovered and lawsuits filed. If the deterrents those lawsuits provided eventually had been part of preemptive rulemaking then these practices would never have been attempted at all. The LIES told by Ajit Pie are pure used hay, fresh from the southbound end of a northbound bull. We KNOW BETTER, we can use our brains. DO NOT REMOVE THEM FROM TITLE II.